By Sandra R. Levitsky
Getting older populations and dramatic alterations in well-being care provision, family constitution, and women's exertions strength participation over the past part century have created what many observers have dubbed a "crisis in care": call for for care of the outdated and infirm is speedily starting to be, whereas the availability of personal care in the kinfolk is considerably contracting. And but, regardless of the well-documented hostile results of up to date care dilemmas at the fiscal defense of households, the actual and psychological wellbeing and fitness of relatives care services, the base line of companies, and the monetary overall healthiness of current social welfare courses, American households have validated little inclination for translating their inner most care difficulties into political calls for for social coverage reform.
Caring for Our personal inverts an everlasting query of social welfare politics. instead of asking why the yankee nation hasn't spoke back to unmet social welfare wishes via increasing social entitlements, this publication asks: Why do not American households view unmet social welfare wishes because the foundation for calls for for brand spanking new kingdom entitlements? How do conventional ideals in kin accountability for social welfare persist even within the face of well-documented unmet want? the reply, this e-book argues, lies in a greater knowing of ways members think strategies to the social welfare difficulties they confront and what prevents new understandings of social welfare provision from constructing into political call for for substitute social preparations. taking good care of Our personal considers the strong ways that latest social guidelines form the political mind's eye, reinforcing longstanding values approximately relations accountability, subverting grievances grounded in notions of social accountability, and in a few infrequent situations, developing new types of social provision that may go beyond current ideological divisions in American social politics.
Read or Download Caring for Our Own: Why There is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights PDF
Best marriage & family books
This available but research-based textual content bargains either foundational theories and sensible functions of study and feedback of mass media portrayals of intercourse, love, and romance in a large choice of mass media, from leisure to ads to information. The multidisciplinary methodological standpoint comes out of a media literacy method and embraces various traditions alongside the quantitative-qualitative continuum.
Laying off new mild on modern campaigns to inspire marriage between welfare recipients and to prosecute "deadbeat dads," other halves with out Husbands lines the efforts of innovative reformers to make "runaway husbands" help their households. Anna R. Igra investigates the interrelated histories of marriage and welfare coverage within the early 1900s, revealing how reformers sought to make marriage the answer to women's and kid's poverty.
This quantity will specialise in leading edge learn that examines how the character of paid paintings intersects with kinfolk and private existence at the present time. even if a few staff have extra balance than others, emerging source of revenue inequality, the continuing upward thrust of nonstandard paintings, extra erosion of unions, technological developments that motivate permeable limitations among paintings and residential, and the pressures of an international 24/7 economic climate generate an air of secrecy of lack of confidence for all.
Whereas the formal definition of divorce should be concise and simple (legal termination of a marital union, dissolving bonds of matrimony among parties), the consequences are whatever yet, fairly while little ones are concerned. The americans for Divorce Reform estimates that "40 or very likely even 50 percentage of marriages will lead to divorce if present traits proceed.
Additional info for Caring for Our Own: Why There is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights
11 Brian Steensland (2007) elegantly shows the influence of cultural categories on 11. For excellent review articles on the influence of culture on state processes, see Padamsee (2009) and Steensland and Smith (2012). I n t ro d u c t io n ( 19 ) policymaking in his account of the failed guaranteed annual income plans of the late 1960s and 1970s. One of the primary obstacles to guaranteed income legislation, Steensland argues, was the cultural distinction that Americans drew between different categories of poor people.
Government support for care is in fact one of the few areas of social provision in recent decades that has witnessed growth among countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in the form of new or expanded social welfare initiatives (Daly 1997). Whether caring services are provided through public means—as is the case in the countries of Scandinavia where households have ready access to public child care and elder care16—or through private but marketized means—as in the case of most OECD countries which provide a wide variety of transfer payments to subsidize the costs of market-based care (Daly 2001a; Ungerson and Yeandle 2007)—the contemporary problems of care provision are increasingly recognized by welfare states as requiring adaptations in existing social policy arrangements (Daly 2005; Pierson 2001b).
Thus, it is possible, for example, for someone to participate in political action without first establishing a sense of collective identity. But the likelihood of such action is generally viewed as greater among populations with a relatively more developed sense of political consciousness. This understanding of politicization incorporates two important dimensions in the development of oppositional consciousness: it involves an ideological shift in the subjective meanings one attaches to one’s circumstances, and a behavioral shift in the extent to which one is willing to personally participate in political demand making (Frease 1975).